<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502</id><updated>2011-10-06T05:51:33.331-07:00</updated><category term='Mass Import'/><category term='IE7'/><category term='XSLT'/><category term='Microsoft CRM 3.0'/><category term='Shared Services'/><category term='HTML'/><category term='SharePoint Designer'/><category term='SharePoint'/><category term='User Profiles and Properties'/><category term='Callout'/><category term='Application Templates'/><category term='Central Administrator'/><category term='Unable to connect to the remote server'/><category term='Google'/><category term='Administration'/><category term='Configuration'/><title type='text'>Work Around your Code</title><subtitle type='html'>Techie, Nerdy, Geeky Programming Blog</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>18</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-3782437636608947054</id><published>2010-03-25T04:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-03-25T04:33:57.372-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stsadm -o migrateuser Generates Error "Object reference not set to an instance of an object"</title><summary type='text'>I have been involved in some migration tasks for SharePoint, that includes changing of the domain name. SharePoint has quite easy ways of doing migration, as long as you don't meet some strange error messages (hey, I think this applies to any migration!). I will discuss about the data migration in more detailed, hope by next post (however, if you need some information for data migration in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/3782437636608947054/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=3782437636608947054&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3782437636608947054'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3782437636608947054'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2010/03/stsadm-o-migrateuser-generates-error.html' title='Stsadm -o migrateuser Generates Error &quot;Object reference not set to an instance of an object&quot;'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-6208000269287809537</id><published>2010-03-09T18:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-09T18:40:10.806-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><title type='text'>SharePoint doesn't work well with IPv6</title><summary type='text'>I have just setup a new server farm for SharePoint. After finish installation for all server farm, I start configuring the Shared Service Provider, include activating SharePoint Search. Once the Search turned on, the whole SharePoint site is inaccessible from the server that hosts the Central Administration, all other Web Front End is ok. The page just displayed 503 - Service unavailable. IIS </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/6208000269287809537/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=6208000269287809537&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/6208000269287809537'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/6208000269287809537'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2010/03/sharepoint-doesnt-work-well-with-ipv6.html' title='SharePoint doesn&apos;t work well with IPv6'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-3882461103109927785</id><published>2010-01-13T05:05:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-13T05:24:07.158-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><title type='text'>SharePoint: How to Move Default Virtual Directory/Site Path Location (Site and Central Administration)</title><summary type='text'>I have encountered requirement to move all the virtual directories to non-system drive. By just removing the default location from C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\virtualdirectories\xx to another drive and set the path in IIS will not solve the problem, somehow SharePoint keeps their own path to the original location, and displays some critical error instead.So the solution is to update the WebApplication</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/3882461103109927785/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=3882461103109927785&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3882461103109927785'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3882461103109927785'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2010/01/sharepoint-how-to-move-virtual.html' title='SharePoint: How to Move Default Virtual Directory/Site Path Location (Site and Central Administration)'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-1793785858502801235</id><published>2008-07-11T01:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-11T01:38:47.767-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><title type='text'>SharePoint 2007: Shared Services "Provision in Progress"</title><summary type='text'>I have one development environment that I use to test webpart or any customizations before deploy to the production server. However, I always failed to setup Shared Services for this particular server, which causes all the search, my site, profile, etc are not working. When the Shared Services are in provisioning stage, it's stopped with timeout error, and in the SharedServices list itself, it's </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/1793785858502801235/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=1793785858502801235&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/1793785858502801235'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/1793785858502801235'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/07/sharepoint-2007-shared-services.html' title='SharePoint 2007: Shared Services &quot;Provision in Progress&quot;'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-5329703057906096473</id><published>2008-06-25T09:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-25T10:05:06.629-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IE7'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><title type='text'>Gmail and IE7: Operation Aborted</title><summary type='text'>Well, I believe many of you have experienced this annoying issue. You try to load Gmail in IE7 and IE7 will popup "Operation Aborted". I usually try about 4-5 times, and at the end the Gmail can be loaded. I am not really sure what's wrong with this, and I hope it's not done purposely by either Microsoft or Google. Some said that this is Google way of responding to Microsoft and Yahoo saga, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/5329703057906096473/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=5329703057906096473&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/5329703057906096473'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/5329703057906096473'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/06/gmail-and-ie7-operation-aborted.html' title='Gmail and IE7: Operation Aborted'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-3136224915840377306</id><published>2008-06-23T20:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-23T20:31:59.448-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><title type='text'>SharePoint 2007: Default.aspx displayed "HTTP 500 Internal Error"</title><summary type='text'>I have experienced wierd behaviour in SharePoint, which if I type http://server-name/sitename/, it will show "HTTP 500 Internal Error", but when I type http://server-name/sitename/default.aspx, it shows the page correctly. The action I have done to the site is to edit the permission for this site (break the inheritance). I fixed the problem by inheriting the permission back from the parent site, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/3136224915840377306/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=3136224915840377306&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3136224915840377306'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3136224915840377306'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/06/sharepoint-2007-defaultaspx-displayed.html' title='SharePoint 2007: Default.aspx displayed &quot;HTTP 500 Internal Error&quot;'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-4916483128547978765</id><published>2008-06-03T08:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T10:27:40.838-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Application Templates'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><title type='text'>Feature '75a0fea7-c54f-46b9-86b1-2e103a8fedba' is not installed in this farm, and can not be added to this scope</title><summary type='text'>Well, if you come to this page from Google, I believe you are working on demo environment of your SharePoint and try to install Application Templates from Microsoft, and you're kind of puzzled and stress, why the Application Templates cannot be installed, as you have done it smoothly in your own VPC.Well, one of the possible reason is ApplicationTemplateCore is not installed yet on your server </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/4916483128547978765/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=4916483128547978765&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/4916483128547978765'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/4916483128547978765'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/06/feature-75a0fea7-c54f-46b9-86b1.html' title='Feature &apos;75a0fea7-c54f-46b9-86b1-2e103a8fedba&apos; is not installed in this farm, and can not be added to this scope'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-210688836305155411</id><published>2008-06-01T22:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-13T01:40:04.423-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint Designer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HTML'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='XSLT'/><title type='text'>SharePoint Designer: Show Line Break for Multi Text (Plain Text)</title><summary type='text'>If you have Multiline type column and set it with "Plain Text", you might have difficulty to show it using Data View (that is added using SharePoint Designer) for the content that has a line break. It will show as a single line. If you view the HTML Source of the page, the line-break character is actually printed there. It's just that HTML will not interpret such white-space character as line </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/210688836305155411/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=210688836305155411&amp;isPopup=true' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/210688836305155411'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/210688836305155411'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/06/sharepoint-designer-show-line-break-for.html' title='SharePoint Designer: Show Line Break for Multi Text (Plain Text)'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-665177747916229280</id><published>2008-06-01T22:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-01T22:49:38.783-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Shared Services'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Administration'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SharePoint'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='User Profiles and Properties'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Central Administrator'/><title type='text'>Access Denied when Accessing User Profiles and Properties</title><summary type='text'>If you try to access User Profiles and Properties using account that is not part of Administrators group or account that is used to setup SharePoint, you might have problem accessing "User Profiles and Properties" (Access Denied) although you have been added to Farm's Administrator or Shared Services' Site Collection Administrator. What you need to do:Click on "Personalization Services Permission</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/665177747916229280/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=665177747916229280&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/665177747916229280'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/665177747916229280'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2008/06/access-denied-when-accessing-user.html' title='Access Denied when Accessing User Profiles and Properties'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-605016139623107758</id><published>2007-11-23T06:39:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2007-11-23T06:42:03.036-08:00</updated><title type='text'>How to Setup Loopback Adapter</title><summary type='text'>Recently, I just got a new notebook, so need to develop something using VPC, but somehow a bit troublesome to configure the network, so decided to use Loopback Adapter instead, so that network can be created easily between the guest and host OS. And just found out that there is extremely easy way to setup Loopback Adapter:1. Open Device Manager2. At the top/root, right click, and select Add </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/605016139623107758/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=605016139623107758&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/605016139623107758'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/605016139623107758'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-to-setup-loopback-adapter.html' title='How to Setup Loopback Adapter'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-3021926879824224570</id><published>2007-02-12T07:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-12T07:39:10.506-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Microsoft CRM 3.0'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Mass Import'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Unable to connect to the remote server'/><title type='text'>Import Mass Data to CRM 3.0: Unable to connect to the remote server</title><summary type='text'>If you have mass/bulk data to be imported which is a custom entity in Microsoft CRM 3.0, there is no other better way, rather than built your own application. By default, CRM 3.0 only provide Bulk Import for Account, Contact and other several system entities (if any). Good luck if you have a lot of custom entities that is not possible to use built-in Bulk Import.And I am not lucky that my project</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3021926879824224570'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/3021926879824224570'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2007/02/import-mass-data-to-crm-30-unable-to.html' title='Import Mass Data to CRM 3.0: Unable to connect to the remote server'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-7259072720145498860</id><published>2007-02-07T02:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-07T03:20:28.503-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Callout'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Configuration'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Microsoft CRM 3.0'/><title type='text'>MS CRM 3.0: Callout's Configuration</title><summary type='text'>As you know that you won't be able to use configuration settings from web.config, since Callout is executed inside CRM 3.0. I am not sure how the execution of Callout, but I suspect it's still under w3wp process, but it's already handled by CRM 3.0 execution and we are not able to use common function in ASP.NET. It's a common requirement that we need to put some configuration like connection </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/7259072720145498860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/7259072720145498860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2007/02/ms-crm-30-callouts-configuration.html' title='MS CRM 3.0: Callout&apos;s Configuration'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-116210577642333968</id><published>2006-10-28T23:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-10-29T00:12:25.536-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Refactoring: Replace Method with Method Object</title><summary type='text'>Well, reading Refactoring book from Martin Fowler, I feel some case of the refactoring I have used before without realizing it. The most interesting I have found so far is Replace Method with Method Object. The idea is if your method is too long, you should find a way to shorten it to make it more readable and self-explained. Well, self-explained can be done using comment in the code. But </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/116210577642333968'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/116210577642333968'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/10/refactoring-replace-method-with-method.html' title='Refactoring: Replace Method with Method Object'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-115580901611269981</id><published>2006-08-17T02:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-08-17T03:03:36.126-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Javascript: Debugger</title><summary type='text'>Although I already quite spent times at coding Javascript, I just knew this useful feature in Javascript, that we can put debugger keyword at new line of the code (without any semi colon) that will function like breakpoint. If your browser has already set to enable debugging (Tools &gt; Internet Options &gt; Advanced &gt; Uncheck Disabled Script Debugging, then when the browser execute that line, it will </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/115580901611269981'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/115580901611269981'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/08/javascript-debugger_17.html' title='Javascript: Debugger'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-115365781212647960</id><published>2006-07-23T05:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-07-23T05:34:48.246-07:00</updated><title type='text'>MS CRM 3.0: How to display Active only at Associated View.</title><summary type='text'>For you do customization on Ms CRM, by default, Ms CRM 3.0 will display both active and inactive record in associated view (View that is displayed child entities in the detail of master entity) for Custom Entities. This is different from default associated view of Contact that is displayed in Account detail, which just displays active record. To achieve same view as Contact, you must edit the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/115365781212647960'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/115365781212647960'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/07/ms-crm-30-how-to-display-active-only.html' title='MS CRM 3.0: How to display Active only at Associated View.'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-114178344522308073</id><published>2006-03-07T17:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-06-10T11:12:10.596-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sharepoint: Hide Toolbar for Anonymous User</title><summary type='text'>In one of my projects, there's a requirement to change UI for Anonymous User. Sharepoint Services by default, display all the functionality to post new item, edit, etc, like in the List/Item Toolbar. And if user is not authorized, than there's screen to request access. This may be good for internal user, but if your Sharepoint is exposed to Internet for anonymous user. This feature looks weird. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114178344522308073'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114178344522308073'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/03/sharepoint-hide-toolbar-for-anonymous.html' title='Sharepoint: Hide Toolbar for Anonymous User'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-114173261590858099</id><published>2006-03-07T03:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-06-10T11:40:52.223-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Javascript: showModal(less)Dialog</title><summary type='text'>In Javascript, if you need to open new window using window.showModalDialog or window.showModelessDialog and then submit form inside the new window, then the form will be submitted to new window, which is usually not the way that we want it to be. There's one workaround that is easy to implement. Just put &lt;base target=_self&gt; inside &lt;head&gt; tag.What is the difference between window.showModalDialog </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114173261590858099'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114173261590858099'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/03/javascript-showmodallessdialog.html' title='Javascript: showModal(less)Dialog'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23579502.post-114173161525517610</id><published>2006-03-07T03:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-07T03:40:15.263-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Preamble</title><summary type='text'>Here I want to share to fellow developers what I found that is useful if you find the same case. Hope you can find this useful too. Happy to sharing with you. I have another blog that is not specific to programming, but because my life is around IT, so you will find it a lot about IT :). But hope I'm not categorized as nerd or geeky, but if I turn out to be.. then I just can laugh. Check </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/feeds/114173161525517610/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=23579502&amp;postID=114173161525517610&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114173161525517610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/23579502/posts/default/114173161525517610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://codearound.blogspot.com/2006/03/preamble.html' title='Preamble'/><author><name>Gunady</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
